Animal Rights Zone

Fighting for animal liberation and an end to speciesism

I have the idea that Gary Francione's abolitionist. Francione is said that nonhuman animals should only have the right not to be the property of humans, is this true?

If only human animals have the right not to be properties then the hunters would not do anything wrong to hunt them.

I am abolitionist but also I am a defender of animal rights. My opinion is that nonhuman animals must have the right to life, to not be mistreated, to legal representation, etc.

As abolitionists, I like the idea of David Pearce to abolish suffering.

I've used the Google translator. My apologies if I'm not well understood.

Regards,


David.

www.RespuestasVeganas.Org/

Views: 56

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi David,

The translation is great!

I believe, as Professor Tom Regan states, that other animals should be afforded the right to their life, their liberty and their bodily integrity.

I do believe that all animals deserve the right not to be the property of another, but I really don't think that goes far enough in explaining what we should be aiming for and asking for.

Unfortunately Prof. Francione doesn't seem to be very good at explaining his theories when questioned about them, choosing instead to become defensive and aggressive. It's a shame he's not better prepared to enter a civil discussion about his theories. Then again, it seems vegan education isn't something he's familiar with.

 

Hi Roger,

Prof. Francione is, I agree, very charming and willing to discuss his theories amongst those who happily agree with both him and his theories. Perhaps I should have used the word "debate" his theories when I suggested that Prof. Francione often became rude and aggressive upon being questioned.

Unfortunately, some who would like to discuss his theories with him live in places other than those he regularly, or even rarely visits and are left with the internet as our only source of communication. It's unfortunate that most attempts to question him are met with unkindness and rudeness under such circumstances.

I agree with the suggestion that other animals should not be regarded as the property of another. I also believe other animals should be afforded more rights than just this one and that many of Prof. Francione's theories simply are either stale and old, or, in this case, doesn't go far enough.

 

 

Reply to Discussion

RSS

About

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

ARZone Podcasts!

Please visit this webpage to subscribe to ARZone podcasts using iTunes

or

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Follow ARZone!

Please follow ARZone on:

Twitter

Google+

Pinterest

A place for animal advocates to gather and discuss issues, exchange ideas, and share information.

Creative Commons License
Animal Rights Zone (ARZone) by ARZone is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at www.arzone.ning.com.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.arzone.ning.com.

Animal Rights Zone (ARZone) Disclaimer

Animal Rights Zone (ARZone) is an animal rights site. As such, it is the position of ARZone that it is only by ending completely the use of other animal as things can we fulfill our moral obligations to them.

Please read the full site disclosure here.

Animal Rights Zone (ARZone) Mission Statement

Animal Rights Zone (ARZone) exists to help educate vegans and non-vegans alike about the obligations human beings have toward all other animals.

Please read the full mission statement here.

Members

Events

Badge

Loading…

© 2024   Created by Animal Rights Zone.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Google+